It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Primary: General mental health assessment Secondary: None identified
Level of care needed based on mental health needs, strengths, risks, and environment.
The purpose of this measure is to determine the level of care needed by children and young people, based on their clinical and psychosocialneeds. This measure also ensures communication among various clinicians (e.g., psychiatrists, social workers, psychologists) to foster collaborative efforts.
The measure is used by clinicians to identify the level of services a child or young person needs, and tocreate a comprehensive treatment plan for children and young people by incorporating information from the child, their parents, and their community. It is also used to monitor the progress of the child’s/young person’s treatment.
Children and young people between 6-18 years.
Additional information to inform measure use
The CALOCUS and the CASII instruments were recently merged in 2021. The asynchronous training for the CASII instrument was modified to be compatible with that of the CALOCUS, considering that the CASII measure was initially developed as an expanded training manual for the CALOCUS. Now, both instruments are collectively referred to as the CALOCUS-CASII (Parks et al., 2023).
Prior to scoring, a comprehensive clinical assessment of the child or young person is done. Scoring is done based on the eight dimensions . Based on an algorithm, responses are translated into one of the six recommended levels of care (level 1 to level 6).
The norms, reliability and validity statistics included in each measure profile are those reported by the author(s) of the measure. It is important to note that altering, adding or removing questions from a measure voids these reported statistics, possibly making the revised tool unreliable and invalid.
The CALOCUS measure was developed by a small work group of cliniciansthat included members of AACAP and AACP based on the adult Levels of Care and Utilization System (LOCUS) measure, followed by a broad consultation of clinicians(Fallon et al., 2006; Sowers et al., 2003).
The authors reported fair to good inter-rater reliability between psychiatrist and non-psychiatrists ranging from 0.57 to 0.95 with composite scores for non-psychologists 1.9 points higher than psychologists’ scores (Fallon et al., 2006).
The authors found moderate correlations between the CALOCUS, CAFASand CGAS ranging from 0.41 to 0.26 for subscales relating to the child’s clinical presentation and correlations near zero for subscales relating to the child’s environment (Fallon et al., 2006).