It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Prices are in Canadian dollars and are accurate as of November 2015. Please see Publisher's website for additional materials.
1996
Original
Primary: School-based mental health Secondary: None identified
Individual learning styles
Measure is designed to assess individual learning preferences of students' everyday lifestyles. Responses do not refer to actual behaviours, but to the preferred learning, relating, and working styles of students. It is based on the Jungian constructs, and the framework of the Myers-Briggs.
Measure can be used to help guide teaching and communication in the school setting, to aid in decision-making related to vocations, and to contribute to counseling purposes. Can also be used in the planning and implementation of interventions. Measure is NOT a diagnostic instrument.
Children and adolescents ages 8 to 17 (Grades 3 to 12).
Extroverted/Introverted, Thinking/Feeling, Practical/ Imaginative, and Organized/Flexible.
Forced-choice format indicating preferred style to an everyday event.
15 to 30 minutes.
Information not indicated / not available at this time
Scores are converted to prevalence-based T-scores, and can be completed by hand or computer software. Measure can be administered by individuals certified by an agency with training in a relevant area of assessment, or a master's degree psychology or a closely related field with formal training in clinical assessment.
The norms, reliability and validity statistics included in each measure profile are those reported by the author(s) of the measure. It is important to note that altering, adding or removing questions from a measure voids these reported statistics, possibly making the revised tool unreliable and invalid.
Norms were developed on a sample of 7,902 students between the ages of 8 and 17. Sample was evenly distributed between males and females, as well as age.
Authors report evidence of an overall test-retest reliability for 7-months of r=.74.
Authors report evidence of construct validity and limited criterion validity. Authors also report evidence convergent and divergent validity.
Callueng, C. M. (2014). Cross-national study of children's temperament: Structural validity of the student styles questionnaire. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol.74(9-A(E)),2014, pp. No Pagination Specified.
Oakland, T., Glutting, J., & Horton, C. (1996). Student Styles Questionnaire. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Oakland, T., Stafford, M. E., Horton, C. B., & Glutting, J. J. (2001). Temperament and vocational preferences: Age, gender, and racial-ethnic comparisons using the Student Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Career Assessment, 9(3), 297-314.
Schraw, G. (2001). Review of the Student Styles Questionnaire. In B.S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.). The Fourteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Stafford, M. E. & Oakland, T. D. (2001). Racial-ethnic comparisons of temperament constructs for three age groups using the student styles questionnaire. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 29(2), 100-111.
Stewart, J. R. (2001). Review of the Student Styles Questionnaire. In B.S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.). The Fourteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.